Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4690K outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4690K is 274 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
- Consumes up to 9% less energy than Intel Core i5-4690K - 80 vs 88 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4690K - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4690K
- Performs up to 10% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 130 vs 118 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€89.07
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €89.07 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 61 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-4690K |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2014 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 4 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 88 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |