Key Differences
In short — Pentium Gold G6400 outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium Gold G6400 is 2433 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium Gold G6400 - 12 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Pentium Gold G6400
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 96 vs 91 FPS
- Consumes up to 28% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 58 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
96
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.79/FPS
100%
Price, €
€75.39
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €75.39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4351 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | Intel Pentium Gold G6400 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Pentium Gold |
Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 2 |
12 | Threads | 4 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | 58 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |