Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5-2630 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 2135 days newer than Xeon E5-2630 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 80 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 45% better in Far Cry 6 than Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 135 vs 93 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 - 24 vs 12 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2630 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2630 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Ivy Bridge EP | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
