Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E5-2620 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 1763 days newer than Xeon E5-2620 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 85 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 16% better in Grand Theft Auto V than Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 137 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 24 vs 12 threads
Grand Theft Auto V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E5-2620 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 8th, 2014 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Haswell-E | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 3.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
85 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
