Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3200G outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3200G is 2135 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3200G
- Performs up to 42% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 316 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 19% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 65 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FPS
316
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.2/FPS
100%
Price, €
€63.55
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €63.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3200G |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Picasso |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 8 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |