Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3047 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 25% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 110 vs 88 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
110
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€67.66
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €67.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10288 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 | vs | Intel Celeron G6900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2022 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel Socket 2011 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
2.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
80 W | TDP | Not Available |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 710 |
No | Overclockable | No |