Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2920X outperforms Xeon E5-2430 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is 2333 days newer than Xeon E5-2430.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2430
- Consumes up to 47% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X - 95 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
- Performs up to 4% better in Dead Space than Xeon E5-2430 - 150 vs 144 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-2430 - 24 vs 12 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
FPS
150
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€399.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €399.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 14212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Oct 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-2430 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Oct 3rd, 2018 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge-EN | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1356 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 12 |
12 | Threads | 24 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
2.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |