Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 932 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 9% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 112 vs 103 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 16 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
112
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.84/FPS
100%
Price, €
€430.01
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 43 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900KF |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Broadwell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |