Key Differences
In short — Core i7-13700F outperforms Xeon E5-1630 v4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-13700F is 2389 days newer than Xeon E5-1630 v4.
Advantages of Intel Core i7-13700F
- Performs up to 26% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 130 vs 103 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 24 vs 8 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.96/FPS
100%
Price, €
€385
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €385 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 40 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-13700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 |
Broadwell | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
140 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |