Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-1630 v4 outperforms Core i7-965 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-1630 v4 is 2772 days newer than Core i7-965.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4
- Performs up to 8% better in No Man's Sky than Core i7-965 - 170 vs 157 FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-965
- Consumes up to 7% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 - 130 vs 140 Watts
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
FPS
157
92%
Value, €/FPS
€0.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€66.63
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €66.63 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 362 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jun 20th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 17th, 2008
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E5-1630 v4 | vs | Intel Core i7-965 |
---|---|---|
Jun 20th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 17th, 2008 |
Xeon E5 | Collection | Core i7 Extreme |
Broadwell | Codename | Bloomfield |
Intel Socket 2011-3 | Socket | Intel Socket 1366 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
140 W | TDP | 130 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 45 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |