Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900K outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900K is 1558 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900K - 45 vs 125 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900K
- Performs up to 2% better in Dead Space than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 154 vs 151 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 20 vs 8 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
154
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€425.94
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €425.94 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15568 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900K |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |