Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900KF outperforms Xeon E3-1575M v5 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-12900KF is 2111 days newer than Xeon E3-1575M v5.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i9-12900KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-12900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900KF
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 258 vs 241 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 - 24 vs 8 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
FPS
258
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€429.41
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €429.41 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 211 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jan 24th, 2016
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1575M v5 | vs | Intel Core i9-12900KF |
---|---|---|
Jan 24th, 2016 | Release Date | Nov 4th, 2021 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Skylake | Codename | Alder Lake |
Intel BGA 1440 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Iris Pro Graphics P580 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |