Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms Core i3-3220 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 1002 days newer than Core i3-3220.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 9% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-3220 - 185 vs 169 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 - 55 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
169
91%
Value, €/FPS
€0.15/FPS
100%
Price, €
€25.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €25.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 398 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Broadwell | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |