Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1285L v4 outperforms FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1285L v4 is 1329 days newer than FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4
- Performs up to 8% better in Apex Legends than FX-4100 - 275 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 220 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1285L v4 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
Broadwell | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel Iris Pro P6300 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |