Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220 is 327 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 18% cheaper than Core i3-3220 - €20.59 vs €25.06
- Up to 20% better value when playing Apex Legends than Core i3-3220 - €0.08 vs €0.1 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220
- Performs up to 1% better in Apex Legends than FX-4100 - 257 vs 255 FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 55 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
Buy for €25.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 264 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-4100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220 |
---|---|---|
Oct 12th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
FX | Collection | Core i3 |
Zambezi | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |