Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900X3D is 3503 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D - 82 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D
- Performs up to 11% better in Halo Infinite than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 177 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 24 vs 8 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Halo Infinite
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
177
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€406
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €406 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 543 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900X3D |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Raphael |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.6 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 120 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 44.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |