Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 5950X outperforms Xeon E3-1280 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 5950X is 2713 days newer than Xeon E3-1280 v3.
Advantages of Xeon E3-1280 v3
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 5950X - 82 vs 105 Watts
Advantages of Ryzen 9 5950X
- Performs up to 15% better in Need For Speed Unbound than Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 158 vs 137 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1280 v3 - 32 vs 8 threads
Need For Speed Unbound
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
FPS
158
100%
Value, €/FPS
€6.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1021.35
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,021.35 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 124 minutes ago
Trending Games
Using the selected game parameters
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Jun 2nd, 2013
Desktop • Nov 5th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1280 v3 | vs | Ryzen 9 5950X |
---|---|---|
Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Nov 5th, 2020 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Haswell | Codename | Vermeer |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 16 |
8 | Threads | 32 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
4.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.9 GHz |
82 W | TDP | 105 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |