Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Xeon E3-1275 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2535 days newer than Xeon E3-1275 v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 6% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 293 vs 277 FPS
- Consumes up to 16% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 - 65 vs 77 Watts
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1275 v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1275 v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| 3.9 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| 77 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 35.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD P4000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
