Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 663 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 2% better in PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds than EPYC 7551P - 293 vs 287 FPS
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than AMD EPYC 7551P - 65 vs 180 Watts
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 64 vs 4 threads
PlayerUnknown's Battlegrounds
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Core i3 | Collection | EPYC |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 32 |
| 4 | Threads | 64 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 180 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
