Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2680 v3 outperforms Core i3-9100F on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2680 v3 is 1688 days older than Core i3-9100F.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 65 vs 120 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Performs up to 0% better in Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition than Core i3-9100F - 204 vs 203 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-9100F - 24 vs 4 threads
Shadow of the Tomb Raider: Definitive Edition
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-9100F | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
4 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 120 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |