Key Differences
In short — Core i5-6400 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-6400 is 1144 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 31% less energy than Intel Core i5-6400 - 45 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-6400 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-6400
- Performs up to 5% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 163 vs 155 FPS
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
FPS
163
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.52/FPS
100%
Price, €
€85.53
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €85.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 129 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Jul 2nd, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-6400 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jul 2nd, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |