Key Differences
In short — Core i3-6100 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-6100 is 1205 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 12% less energy than Intel Core i3-6100 - 45 vs 51 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-6100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-6100
- Performs up to 12% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 103 vs 92 FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
103
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.67/FPS
100%
Price, €
€68.52
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €68.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i3-6100 |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |