Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13600KF outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13600KF is 3788 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 64% less energy than Intel Core i5-13600KF - 45 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-13600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13600KF
- Performs up to 30% better in Assassin's Creed Odyssey than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 153 vs 118 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 20 vs 8 threads
Assassin's Creed Odyssey
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
153
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.77/FPS
100%
Price, €
€271.33
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €271.33 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-13600KF |
---|---|---|
May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 27th, 2022 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 14 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 125 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |