Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 5800X3D outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 5800X3D is 3628 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D - 45 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D
- Performs up to 335% better in League of Legends than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 296 vs 68 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
League of Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Ryzen 7 5800X3D
Desktop • Apr 20th, 2022
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Single-Core
562
26.87709230033477%
Multi-Core
1875
17.113910186199345%
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 5800X3D |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2022 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Vermeer |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 8 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
