Buy on Amazon
€228.23
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $221
Availability
MSRP in USD: $221
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13400 outperforms Xeon E3-1265L v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13400 is 3887 days newer than Xeon E3-1265L v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13400
- Performs up to 112% better in The Callisto Protocol than Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 161 vs 76 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 - 16 vs 8 threads
The Callisto Protocol
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-13400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
161
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.42/FPS
100%
Price, €
€228.23
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel® Core™ i5-13400 Desktop-Prozessor 10 Kerne (6 P-cores und 4 E-cores) 20 MB Cache, bis zu 4,6 GHz
Buy for €228.23 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1265L v2
Server/Workstation • May 14th, 2012
Core i5-13400
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1265L v2 | vs | Intel Core i5-13400 |
|---|---|---|
| May 14th, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 10 |
| 8 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| 3.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
| 45 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 25.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 730 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Xeon E3-1265L v2 or Core i5-13400
The Callisto Protocol, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
29 FPS
€25.48/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-13400
16 GB, 512 GB SSD
Buy on Amazon
€739
In Stock
29 FPS
€26.52/FPS
GeForce GTX 1650
Core i5-13400
8 GB, 240 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD
Buy on Amazon
€769
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
