Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 791 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 45 vs 84 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 40% better in F1 23 than Xeon E3-1260L - 209 vs 149 FPS
F1 23
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 84 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
| Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
