Key Differences
In short — Core i3-4130T outperforms Xeon E3-1260L on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-4130T is 882 days newer than Xeon E3-1260L.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4130T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4130T
- Performs up to 5% better in Battlefield IV than Xeon E3-1260L - 391 vs 371 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Xeon E3-1260L - 35 vs 45 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | Intel Core i3-4130T |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
Xeon E3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
45 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |