Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms Xeon E5-2680 v3 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 463 days older than Xeon E5-2680 v3.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 5% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 104 vs 99 FPS
- Consumes up to 30% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 - 84 vs 120 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-4670K - 24 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-4670K
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Xeon E5-2680 v3
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-4670K | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2680 v3 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 2nd, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
| Core i5 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Haswell |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 4 | Cores | 12 |
| 4 | Threads | 24 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
84 W | TDP | 120 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 4600 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |
