Key Differences
In short — Xeon E3-1260L outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E3-1260L is 569 days older than FX-6300.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E3-1260L
- Consumes up to 53% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 45 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Tom Clancy's Ghost Recon Wildlands
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Xeon E3-1260L
Server/Workstation • Apr 3rd, 2011
FX-6300
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E3-1260L | vs | AMD FX-6300 |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 3rd, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
| Xeon E3 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 4 | Cores | 6 |
8 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
| 3.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
45 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
24.0x | Multiplier | 17.5x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
