Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U outperforms FX-6300 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U is 2358 days newer than FX-6300.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than FX-6300 - 176 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 84% less energy than AMD FX-6300 - 15 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6300 doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €49.68 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Mobile • Apr 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD FX-6300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 PRO 3700U |
---|---|---|
Oct 23rd, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 8th, 2019 |
FX | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Vishera | Codename | Picasso |
AMD Socket AM3+ | Socket | AMD Socket FP5 |
Desktop | Segment | Mobile |
6 | Cores | 4 |
6 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.3 GHz |
4.1 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 15 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
17.5x | Multiplier | 23.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 10 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |