Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 3900X outperforms Xeon E-2136 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 3900X is 360 days newer than Xeon E-2136.
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2136
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 3900X - 80 vs 105 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 9 3900X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 3900X
- Performs up to 0% better in Monster Hunter: World than Xeon E-2136 - 260 vs 259 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Xeon E-2136 - 24 vs 12 threads
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Xeon E-2136
Server/Workstation • Jul 12th, 2018
Ryzen 9 3900X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Xeon E-2136 | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 3900X |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 12th, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
| Xeon E | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
| Coffee Lake | Codename | Matisse |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Server | Segment | Desktop |
| 6 | Cores | 12 |
| 12 | Threads | 24 |
| 3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| 4.5 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
80 W | TDP | 105 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 33.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
UHD Graphics P630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
