Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Pentium P6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3504 days newer than Pentium P6100.
Advantages of Intel Pentium P6100
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 9% better in The Last of Us Part I than Pentium P6100 - 137 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium P6100 - 16 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.46/FPS
100%
Price, €
€199.95
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €199.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15089 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Sep 26th, 2010
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium P6100 | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Sep 26th, 2010 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Pentium | Collection | Core i7 |
Arrandale | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G1 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
15.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |