Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms Pentium G640 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1185 days newer than Pentium G640.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Pentium G640 - 170 vs 168 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Pentium G640 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €47.66 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jun 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G640 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |