Buy on Amazon
€216.77
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms Pentium G4620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than Pentium G4620.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G4620
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 12% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Pentium G4620 - 134 vs 120 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G4620 - 8 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
134
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€216.77
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i3-10320 (Basistakt: 3,80GHZ; Sockel: LGA1200; 65Watt) Box, BX8070110320 Black
Buy for €216.77 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 38481 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Core i3-10320
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Pentium G4620
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
757
49.187784275503574%
Multi-Core
1599
34.56549935149157%
Intel Pentium G4620 | vs | Intel Core i3-10320 |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Kaby Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 37.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
| Intel HD 630 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
