Key Differences
In short — Core i3-9100F outperforms Pentium G3220T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-9100F is 2060 days newer than Pentium G3220T.
Advantages of Intel Pentium G3220T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-9100F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-9100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-9100F
- Performs up to 24% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Pentium G3220T - 554 vs 447 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Pentium G3220T - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Pentium G3220T
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Core i3-9100F
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220T | vs | Intel Core i3-9100F |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
| Pentium | Collection | Core i3 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
