Key Differences
In short — Pentium G3220 outperforms Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Pentium G3220 is 730 days older than Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Consumes up to 4% less energy than Intel Pentium G3220 - 51 vs 53 Watts
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
119
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.45/FPS
100%
Price, €
€53.15
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €53.15 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10392 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2013
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium G3220 | vs | Intel Celeron G3900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2015 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
53 W | TDP | 51 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 510 |
No | Overclockable | No |