Key Differences
In short — Celeron G1620 outperforms Pentium 3805U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G1620 is 818 days older than Pentium 3805U.
Advantages of Intel Pentium 3805U
- Consumes up to 73% less energy than Intel Celeron G1620 - 15 vs 55 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Performs up to 16% better in Immortals of Aveum than Pentium 3805U - 22 vs 19 FPS
Immortals of Aveum
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
FPS
22
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.92/FPS
100%
Price, €
€20.16
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €20.16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Mar 1st, 2015
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Pentium 3805U | vs | Intel Celeron G1620 |
---|---|---|
Mar 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Dec 3rd, 2012 |
Pentium | Collection | Celeron |
Broadwell-U | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel BGA 1168 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
1.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
15 W | TDP | 55 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
19.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD |
No | Overclockable | No |