Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900F outperforms Core i9-9900T on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900F is 373 days newer than Core i9-9900T.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Performs up to 3% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i9-9900T - 193 vs 187 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i9-9900T - 20 vs 16 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for €291.44 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 189 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Single-Core
1433
85.50119331742243%
Multi-Core
5994
71.13695703774032%
Intel Core i9-9900T | vs | Intel Core i9-10900F |
---|---|---|
Apr 23rd, 2019 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i9 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 10 |
16 | Threads | 20 |
2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.2 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |