Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-14600K outperforms the cheaper Core i9-10900F on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-14600K is 1265 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-10900F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900F
- Up to 6% cheaper than Core i5-14600K - €294.53 vs €311.98
Advantages of Intel Core i5-14600K
- Performs up to 15% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-10900F - 135 vs 117 FPS
- Up to 8% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i9-10900F - €2.31 vs €2.52 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €294.53 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 203 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.31/FPS
100%
Price, €
€311.98
94%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €311.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 17th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-10900F | vs | Intel Core i5-14600K |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 17th, 2023 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Raptor Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
10 | Cores | 14 |
20 | Threads | 20 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | Not Available |
14 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |