Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper FX-8350 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-8350 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 2268 days newer than the cheaper FX-8350.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than FX-8350 - 137 vs 115 FPS
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than AMD FX-8350 - 95 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-8350 - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-8350
- Up to 64% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €155.88 vs €430.01
- Up to 57% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900KF - €1.36 vs €3.14 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
137
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.14/FPS
43%
Price, €
€430.01
36%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
Buy for €155.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 23 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Oct 23rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD FX-8350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 23rd, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 8 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 125 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |