Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900KF outperforms the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ryzen 5 2400G is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900KF is 330 days newer than the cheaper Ryzen 5 2400G.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900KF
- Performs up to 5% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Ryzen 5 2400G - 209 vs 199 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen 5 2400G - 16 vs 8 threads
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 2400G
- Up to 71% cheaper than Core i9-9900KF - €124.24 vs €430.01
- Up to 70% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Core i9-9900KF - €0.62 vs €2.06 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900KF - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
209
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.06/FPS
30%
Price, €
€430.01
28%
FPS Winner
Buy for €430.01 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 133 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
FPS
199
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€124.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €124.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Desktop • Feb 12th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-9900KF | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 2400G |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 12th, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Raven Ridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 4 |
16 | Threads | 8 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 11 |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |