Key Differences
In short — Core i9-7940X outperforms Ryzen Threadripper 1900X on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-7940X is 1 days newer than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7940X
- Performs up to 1% better in Dead Space than Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 151 vs 149 FPS
- Consumes up to 8% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 165 vs 180 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X - 28 vs 16 threads
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
FPS
149
98%
Value, €/FPS
€1.23/FPS
100%
Price, €
€183.04
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €183.04 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 100 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2017
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-7940X | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900X |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2017 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2017 |
Core i9 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Skylake | Codename | Whitehaven |
Intel Socket 2066 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
14 | Cores | 8 |
28 | Threads | 16 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
165 W | TDP | 180 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |