Buy on Amazon
€60.24
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $524
Availability
MSRP in USD: $524
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $42
Availability
MSRP in USD: $42
Key Differences
In short — Core i9-14900F outperforms Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-14900F is 2106 days newer than Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-14900F
- Performs up to 15% better in Dead Space than Celeron G4900 - 168 vs 146 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-14900F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Celeron G4900 3,1 GHz verwendet Dual-Core Dual-Thread 54W CPU-Prozessor LGA 1151
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 309 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i9-14900F
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G4900
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
20.397350993377483%
Multi-Core
1051
5.7525998905309255%
Intel Core i9-14900F | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
| Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
| Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
| 2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
| 5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
| Not Available | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 20.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
