Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900KS outperforms the cheaper Core i5-11400F on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i5-11400F is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900KS is 667 days newer than the cheaper Core i5-11400F.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900KS
- Performs up to 40% better in War Thunder than Core i5-11400F - 301 vs 215 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 32 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Up to 84% cheaper than Core i9-13900KS - €113.49 vs €690.13
- Up to 77% better value when playing War Thunder than Core i9-13900KS - €0.53 vs €2.29 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900KS - 65 vs 150 Watts
War Thunder
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
FPS
301
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.29/FPS
23%
Price, €
€690.13
16%
FPS Winner
Buy for €690.13 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5278 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
215
71%
Value, €/FPS
€0.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€113.49
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €113.49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Movie
Desktop • Jan 12th, 2023
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900KS | vs | Intel Core i5-11400F |
---|---|---|
Jan 12th, 2023 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Core i9 | Collection | Core i5 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 6 |
32 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.6 GHz |
6.0 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
150 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 26.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | None |
Yes | Overclockable | No |