Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i5-11400F outperforms the more expensive Core i9-9900X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i5-11400F is 879 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-9900X.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 7% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900X - 142 vs 133 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i9-9900X - €102.9 vs €713.74
- Up to 87% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900X - €0.72 vs €5.37 per FPS
- Consumes up to 61% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900X - 65 vs 165 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 20 vs 12 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
100%
Price, €
€102.9
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €102.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 463 minutes ago
Buy for €713.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 463 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 10 |
12 | Threads | 20 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 165 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |