Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11400F outperforms the cheaper Core i9-9900K on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i9-9900K is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11400F is 879 days newer than the cheaper Core i9-9900K.
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11400F
- Performs up to 4% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i9-9900K - 142 vs 136 FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-9900K - 65 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900K
- Up to 87% cheaper than Core i5-11400F - €12.76 vs €101.9
- Up to 88% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i5-11400F - €0.09 vs €0.72 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-11400F - 16 vs 12 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-11400F doesn't have integrated graphics
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
142
100%
Value, €/FPS
€0.72/FPS
12%
Price, €
€101.9
12%
FPS Winner
Buy for €101.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15931 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
136
95%
Value, €/FPS
€0.09/FPS
100%
Price, €
€12.76
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €12.76 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15931 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i5-11400F | vs | Intel Core i9-9900K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i5 | Collection | Core i9 |
Rocket Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
6 | Cores | 8 |
12 | Threads | 16 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |