Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900K is 1638 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900K
- Performs up to 62% better in New World than Celeron G4900 - 162 vs 100 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 32 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 89% cheaper than Core i9-13900K - €60.24 vs €528.89
- Up to 82% better value when playing New World than Core i9-13900K - €0.6 vs €3.26 per FPS
- Consumes up to 57% less energy than Intel Core i9-13900K - 54 vs 125 Watts
New World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
FPS
162
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.26/FPS
18%
Price, €
€528.89
11%
FPS Winner
Buy for €528.89 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
100
61%
Value, €/FPS
€0.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€60.24
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €60.24 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 173 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 27th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900K | vs | Intel Celeron G4900 |
---|---|---|
Sep 27th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 3rd, 2018 |
Core i9 | Collection | Celeron |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 2 |
32 | Threads | 2 |
3.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
5.8 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
125 W | TDP | 54 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
30.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 610 |
Yes | Overclockable | No |