Key Differences
In short — Core i9-13900F outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-13900F is 4102 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-13900F
- Performs up to 48% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than FX-4100 - 132 vs 89 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-4100 - 32 vs 4 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 96% cheaper than Core i9-13900F - €20.59 vs €569.47
- Up to 95% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i9-13900F - €0.23 vs €4.31 per FPS
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €569.47 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 143 minutes ago
Buy for €20.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 144 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-13900F | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
24 | Cores | 4 |
32 | Threads | 4 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
5.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 95 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |