Key Differences
In short — Core i9-12900K outperforms the cheaper FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-6200 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-12900K is 3538 days newer than the cheaper FX-6200.
Advantages of Intel Core i9-12900K
- Performs up to 37% better in Valorant than FX-6200 - 932 vs 680 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 24 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Up to 90% cheaper than Core i9-12900K - €42.6 vs €427.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing Valorant than Core i9-12900K - €0.06 vs €0.46 per FPS
Valorant
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for €427 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6532 minutes ago
Buy for €42.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6531 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Nov 4th, 2021
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i9-12900K | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
---|---|---|
Nov 4th, 2021 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
Core i9 | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
16 | Cores | 3 |
24 | Threads | 6 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
5.2 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
125 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
UHD Graphics 770 | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
Yes | Overclockable | Yes |