Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms FX-6200 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 2687 days newer than FX-6200.
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 11% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than FX-6200 - 171 vs 154 FPS
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-6200 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than AMD FX-6200 - 16 vs 6 threads
Advantages of AMD FX-6200
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Ryzen 7 3700X
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
FX-6200
Desktop • Feb 27th, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X | vs | AMD FX-6200 |
|---|---|---|
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Feb 27th, 2012 |
| Ryzen 7 | Collection | FX |
| Matisse | Codename | Zambezi |
| AMD Socket AM4 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
8 | Cores | 3 |
16 | Threads | 6 |
| 3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
7 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 19.0x |
| None | Integrated Graphics | On certain motherboards (Chipset feature) |
| Yes | Overclockable | Yes |
